If you’ve ever looked at a pressed flower and thought, “Cute. But can it emotionally confront me about my relationship with technology?”then you’re already halfway to understanding Lena Chubar’s artistic lane. Working under the name Elen Alien, Chubar builds contemporary, eco-minded artworks using botanical materials (yes, real plants) while asking very modern questions about identity, beauty standards, and what happens when humans start living like avatars.
This article breaks down who Lena Chubar is, what makes her work distinctive, why oshibana (pressed-flower art) has quietly become a self-care hobby and a serious medium again, and how to look at botanical art with the eyes of both a collector and a curious human who still touches grass (at least occasionally).
Who Is Lena Chubar?
Lena Chubar is a contemporary artist best known online and in exhibitions as Elen Alien. Her public artist bio describes a path that blends formal study and practical design work with an increasingly nomadic, cross-European art practicemoving through places like Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and later Londonwhile refining a signature approach: using dried botanicals as a primary material in concept-driven contemporary work.
Chubar’s background also includes architecture and design influences, which helps explain why her compositions often feel “built,” not merely arrangedstructured like images with a strong sense of balance, negative space, and intentional framing. Think less “craft project,” more “this belongs under museum-grade glass and I am not touching it with my greasy snack fingers.”
The Medium That Makes People Lean In: Oshibana Meets Contemporary Art
At the heart of Chubar’s practice is oshibanathe Japanese tradition of making images with pressed plant material. Historically, pressed flowers have served both science and sentiment: from herbaria used for study to keepsake albums meant to preserve a moment (and, occasionally, a heartbreak). Today, oshibana is having a resurgence in the U.S. thanks to workshops, DIY culture, and the growing appetite for slow, tactile crafts that feel like a mini-vacation from screens.
Chubar’s twist is to treat pressed botanicals not as a decorative finish, but as a serious pictorial language. Leaves become shadow. Petals become skin tone. Stems become linework. Texture replaces brushstroke. And because the material is literally organic, the work carries built-in symbolism: beauty, decay, preservation, and the uncomfortable truth that time is undefeated.
Why pressed botanicals hit differently than paint
- They’re time-sensitive. Plant material is fragile and can shift in tone over time, so the “moment” is baked into the artwork.
- They’re physically real. The viewer isn’t just seeing a flower; they’re seeing a flower that has been transformed into image and meaning.
- They create a double read. From far away: portrait, figure, abstraction. Up close: a botanical inventory of tiny decisions.
What Her Work Is Really About (Beyond “Pretty Flowers”)
Lena Chubar’s themes are consistently contemporary: identity under pressure, the body in a culture that measures people like products, and the tension between nature and the digital world. In interviews and exhibition notes, her work is described as exploring how humans transform into “avatars,” and how technology reshapes self-perceptionwhile nature becomes both refuge and reference point.
In other words: yes, the flowers are beautiful. But they’re not there just to be cute. They’re there to ask why we treat bodies like upgradeable hardware, why “authentic” is now a filter setting, and why we crave permanence in a world where even our data isn’t guaranteed to last.
Example: the “FloVer” series and the body-as-idea
One way this shows up is in her “FloVer” setworks that combine pressed botanicals with figurative and conceptual concerns. A piece titled “Eve” (documented on a major art marketplace) is presented as part of this series and frames the body not as a simplistic “ideal,” but as one attribute among many in human attraction and connection. It nudges viewers to question how modern culture elevates appearance into a kind of social currencyand what gets lost when uniqueness is replaced by copy-and-paste beauty standards.
Example: “The Garden of Transcendence” and the digital/natural collision
Another anchor is “The Garden of Transcendence”, described in residency materials as an exploration of balance between digital and natural realmscombining digital sketches and oil painting with dried flowers to produce an image space where “nature” and “technology” aren’t enemies, but tangled roommates sharing the same rent.
How a Botanical Artwork Gets Made (Without Ruining Your Weekend)
Pressed-flower art looks deceptively effortless until you try it and realize flowers do not naturally want to become flat. They want to become mush. The key is controlled drying and patient handlingbasically the opposite of how most people treat their email inbox.
The practical backbone: pressing and drying
Natural history museums and botanical institutions share similar fundamentals for pressing plant material: you press specimens between absorbent layers, ensure airflow, and give the material time to dry evenly. The goal is to remove moisture while keeping form and color as stable as possible.
- Layering matters: alternating newspaper/blotting layers and corrugated cardboard helps airflow and prevents mold.
- Pressure matters: enough weight to keep things flat, not so much that petals fuse into sadness.
- Time matters: rushing creates browning and warping; patience creates usable material.
Sealing, framing, and “please don’t fade” strategy
Botanical works are often sealed and framed to protect fragile materials from humidity, shifting, and light exposure. Some approaches use archival framing and UV-protective glass; others incorporate resin or mixed-media techniques. Chubar’s public portfolio notes gallery-style framing for certain pieces, and her broader practice is often described as blending botanicals with other contemporary mediums.
Why Botanical Art Is Having a Moment in the U.S.
Pressed plants have long been a bridge between art and documentation. In the U.S., museums and libraries preserve pressed specimens and albums because they’re evidenceof plants, of places, of culture. Meanwhile, modern hobbyists love the practice because it’s slow, sensory, and oddly meditative. If doomscrolling is a treadmill for your anxiety, pressing flowers is the gentle walk where your brain finally unclenches.
This broader cultural “return” helps contextualize why Lena Chubar’s work resonates: she’s using a historical medium (pressed botanicals) to talk about very current problems (identity, technology, permanence). That contrast creates frictionand friction makes art interesting.
Pressed plants aren’t just nostalgicthey’re informative
Scientific institutions emphasize that physical specimens remain valuable even in the digital age because they can support different kinds of study (materials, structure, and later analysis). That same logicmaterial mattersalso applies to art: a pressed flower is not the same as a photograph of a flower. It carries weight, literally and conceptually.
How to View (and Collect) Work Like Lena Chubar’s
Botanical mixed media lives at the intersection of fine art, craft, and conservation. If you’re collecting (or just admiring intensely from a safe distance), here’s a practical lens.
What to look for
- Concept + material alignment: Are the botanicals doing narrative work, or are they merely decorative?
- Stability decisions: How is the work sealed, mounted, and framed? Is it built for longevity?
- Composition integrity: Does the piece read at multiple distancesimage from afar, micro-choices up close?
Care basics (your future self will thank you)
- Light control: keep out of harsh, direct sunlight; UV is not your artwork’s friend.
- Humidity control: avoid bathrooms, kitchens, and anywhere steam gathers like it pays rent.
- Archival thinking: museum guidance for plant specimens and albums tends to emphasize stable materials and careful handlinggood habits for botanical art, too.
FAQ: Quick Answers About Lena Chubar and Oshibana Art
Is Lena Chubar the same person as Elen Alien?
Public artist materials and online presence commonly associate the name Lena Chubar with the professional artist identity “Elen Alien,” including portfolio pages and listings under that name.
What makes her pressed-flower work “contemporary” instead of purely decorative?
The concepts: technology’s influence on identity, the body as a social battlefield, and the desire to preserve what’s inherently temporary. The botanicals aren’t just prettythey’re symbolic material with a built-in relationship to time.
Can beginners try oshibana at home?
Yes. Many U.S.-based museums, libraries, and workshops share beginner-friendly methods (pressing in books or simple presses, layering paper and cardboard, sealing finished pieces). Start small: a simple collage teaches more than an overambitious “floral Sistine Chapel.”
: Experiences Inspired by “Lena Chubar” (What It Feels Like to Try This World)
If Lena Chubar’s work makes you want to do something with plants other than accidentally kill them on a windowsill, you’re not alone. People describe oshibana as calming because it forces a pace you can’t fake. Flowers won’t press faster because you’re impatient. Leaves don’t care about your calendar invite. The medium basically says: “Congrats on being human. Now slow down.”
The first experience most beginners have is surprise at how architectural pressing feels. You start by choosing materialspetals, leaves, stemsand suddenly you’re thinking like a designer: What shape reads as a shadow? Which leaf has the right edge to become a jawline? What happens if you rotate a petal and it becomes a highlight instead of a flower? Chubar’s practice makes sense here: when the image is built from fragments, composition isn’t optional; it’s the entire game.
Then comes the humbling part: color drift. A bright bloom can darken, a delicate petal can bruise, and the “perfect” piece can come out of the press looking like it survived a minor tragedy. Oddly, that’s also where the emotional hook lives. Pressed-flower art is preservation with a disclaimer. You’re saving something, but not in its original formmore like memory than photograph. That tension echoes what Chubar’s work often points toward: the wish to keep something pure while living inside a world that constantly edits and compresses everything (including us).
Workshops in the U.S. often frame the process as both technique and ritual: selecting botanicals, pressing, unpressing, arranging, sealing to reduce fading, and finishing with a matted, framed look. The experience is tactile and satisfying in a way screens rarely are. You feel the difference between a brittle leaf and a velvet-soft petal. You learn to use tweezers because your fingers are suddenly clumsy giants. You discover that negative space is not “empty”it’s breathing room for the piece and for you.
The most “Chubar-adjacent” experience is when you stop making flower pictures and start making meaning. A figure built from petals doesn’t just show a body; it makes you think about bodies. A face made from dried plants quietly asks what’s natural and what’s performed. And when you seal the finished work, you feel the strange power of choosing what gets preservedbecause in real life, most things don’t ask permission before changing.
If you try a Lena Chubar–inspired session at home, keep it simple: press a handful of materials, sketch a loose silhouette, and build from light to dark. Treat every botanical piece like a brushstroke you can’t undo. And when something goes “wrong,” don’t panicpressed-flower art has always lived between control and surrender. That’s not a flaw. That’s the point.
Conclusion
Lena Chubar (Elen Alien) sits at a fascinating intersection: a historic botanical practice and modern conceptual questions about identity, the body, technology, and preservation. Her work reminds us that “natural materials” don’t have to mean simple, rustic, or purely decorative. In the right hands, a petal can act like a pixel, a leaf like a brushstroke, and a dried flower like a quiet argument against the idea that anythingbeauty, data, selfhoodcan be truly permanent.
If nothing else, her art encourages a rare modern behavior: looking closely, slowing down, and remembering that nature still has better design instincts than most of our apps.



